APPLE PASSWORD PART FREAKIN' 2

So,  I am so into this dude from Gizmodo now

I did some digging,.. and everyone is writing on HOW and WHAT and WHO…

umm this is so crazy that I am convinced that there was a deeper motive and still no one seems to see or care

what mortifies me more over this issue given is that the fast food / Facebook thinking of our mainstream seems only too focused on the obvious

that is, APPLE was at fault

umm please, if you have to blame them, I need to ask a stupid question first….

1. Said Apple victim thoroughly admits the gate keepers amazon and google were not properly protected, is there a reason that this did not happen?
2.  If said victim was in fact a tech writer, (a senior one I might add) shouldn't said tech writer make sure he was up date on all his cutting edge shit he writes about anyhow?

I make mention this way because its questions that if I was to influence behavior of so many folks who can't think for themselves id probably find those within the sheep fold might ask. After all,. you should be embodying what you teach right?

Ill put it yet another way:

 once upon a time Ghandi was out talking to his followers. A lady approached him and said , "please ask my child to stop eating sugar"

He said , "come back in two weeks"

Two weeks later he was approached again by the lady and her child. 

"Stop eating sugar!", he yelled. and kept on walking.

The lady being totally annoyed by what he did ran up and yelled, " You could have done that 2 weeks ago!!"

"Yeah.", he said. "I could have, but I was eating sugar 2 weeks ago!!"

So,. I am convinced I am looking at something more,.. was the said writer on his ball or did he really not do it because he had other ideas. really its simple,.. bad tech writer or mastermind,….. lets see if lex luther can answer this one because he's gonna have to be careful about what he has said and WILL say

Im watching,.. and I am sure others are too. 

oh and another thing and I will look into this one in a while,.. not because I am masterminding anything but because I have not seen much on this supposed hacker he "spoke to" on condition on anonymity.  seems to me too convenient that a pseudonym of phobia was chosen,.. I found it odd since this whole thing was playing on fears of the stability of cloud based services and its security.

but again I am just touching on this because I feel its relevant to my questioning and yet needs to be reserved for now.

its just too much that no one seems to be so willing to ask said questions.

well good night again…….